[rfc-i] Reminder: RFC++ BoF

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Mon Jul 16 15:04:01 PDT 2018


Just rest assured that the answer to the great question of life, the RFCs,
and everything, is 42.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> Note: After reading the agenda, all referenced drafts (0) and the
> meeting slides, I still have no idea what problem the BOF has been
> scheduled to solve.
>
> I know it's "the RFC problem", but don't know what this problem consists
> of.
>
> That's not a good state to be in.
>
> On 07/16/2018 08:18 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > A reminder that the RFC++ BoF is this evening from 18:10-19:40 in the
> > Laurier room.
> >
> > BoF description: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/
> > Mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rfcplusplus
> > Mailing list archive:
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfcplusplus/
> >
> > If you are unable to attend and have opinions, please join the
> > rfcplusplus list and add your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Heather
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20180716/1bce1691/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list