[rfc-i] Bug in RFC Search page...
cabo at tzi.org
Tue Sep 26 13:49:56 PDT 2017
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 22:41, Toerless Eckert <tte+ietf at cs.fau.de> wrote:
> What terminology do you propose
> ASCII text -> plain-text
> UTF-8 text -> plain-text unicode
Well, both are plain-text, and both are unicode.
Plain-text-beyond-ascii would be more like it for the second, but why call that out.
(And no, we don’t need a third category Plain-text-beyond-the-basic-multilingual-plane, or Plain-text-with-astral for short.)
> HTML ASCII -> HTML
> HTML UTF-8 -> HTML unicode
I don’t think that distinction ever needs to be made, because HTML embeds metadata about its charset, and there are no real interop problems when you do that.
More information about the rfc-interest