[rfc-i] RFC 7991 ol at type
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Fri Sep 8 06:53:27 PDT 2017
On 7 Sep 2017, at 22:56, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
>>> If I specify type="a", is this equivalent to type="%c" or type="%c."
>> My implementation does the latter (as this is what CSS will do with
> Does this warrant an erratum?
It warrants a issue in
More information about the rfc-interest