[rfc-i] Two drafts showing the advantage of the new format

Phillip Hallam-Baker phill at hallambaker.com
Wed Aug 16 17:22:18 PDT 2017

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 8/16/17 5:29 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The diagrams illustrating the cryptographic protocol would be simply
> unreadable if attempted in ASCII art. The ability to use super and
> subscripts totally matters when describing a cryptographic protocol.
> Aside --
> The diagrams in the new format will not allow colors. You're going to want
> to use some other mechanism to indicate what you are currently intending
> color to mean.
Perhaps we should let IETF participants see and decide for themselves?

Until you have a working toolset, all you have is suggestions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20170816/a12e2934/attachment.html>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list