[rfc-i] I-D Action: draft-iab-rfc-nonascii-01.txt
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Mon Feb 29 12:11:01 PST 2016
I agree that sorting is out of scope. I'm fine with one of the drafts saying that the order of authors in the input file is maintained by the prep tool as well as the output formats. Maybe in the framework draft?
On 2/29/16, 11:51 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>I just wondered whether we need to say anything about the sorting
>order of non-ASCII names, or is that out of scope? I hope it is,
>because it seems like a fiendishly hard problem. Maybe we do need
>to say somewhere that the order in which the authors appear in the
>xml source is the order in which they will appear in the RFC and in
>the RFC index and citations.
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest