[rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02: references

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Sat Feb 27 08:54:28 PST 2016

On 2016-02-27 17:38, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> ...
>> but it's also not what the tools generate today,
> Right: we're talking about new tools for a new vocabulary
>> and most likely not what the RFC production center wants.
> Neither you or I work for the RPC; we can let them comment on what they
> want.


>>>>> <section id="n-references">
>>>>> <h2 id="s-3">
>>>>> <a href="#s-3" class="selfRef">3.</a>
>>>>> <a href="#n-references" class="selfRef">References</a>
>>>>> </h2>
>>>>> <section id="n-informative-references">
>>>>> <h3 id="s-3.1">
>>>>> <a href="#s-3.1" class="selfRef">3.1.</a>
>>>>> <a href="#n-informative-references" class="selfRef">
>>>>> Informative References</a></h3>
>>>>> <dl class="reference">...
>>>>> </dl>
>>>>> </section>
>>>>> </section>
>>>> This doesn't explain where the ID for the enclosing section comes from.
>>> Which ID are you referring to? Both of those look pretty clear to me,
>>> but maybe I'm missing something.
>> It's not clear where they come from; from the source document? Are
>> they automatically inserted?
> They are automatically inserted by the prep tool, as described in
> section B.2.1 of the v3 vocabulary document.

OK, I missed that, sorry.

What's not clear then is where the value of an anchor attribute on 
<references> would end up.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list