[rfc-i] draft-iab-html-rfc-02: references

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Sat Feb 27 08:27:27 PST 2016

On 27 Feb 2016, at 1:03, Julian Reschke wrote:

> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-iab-html-rfc-02.html#element.references>:
>> If there is at least one <references> element, a "References" section 
>> is added to the document, continuing with the next major section 
>> number after the last <section>.
>> Each references element will be added to that "References" section as 
>> if it were a section itself.
> That doesn't work. For a document that has only one <references> 
> element (for instance, just normative references), it will lead to 
> unnecessary (and uncommon) nesting.

Why does "unnecessary (and uncommon) nesting" equate to "doesn't work"? 
Is that just a value judgement, or is there something technically wrong 
with that kind of nesting?

>> <section id="n-references">
>> <h2 id="s-3">
>> <a href="#s-3" class="selfRef">3.</a>
>> <a href="#n-references" class="selfRef">References</a>
>> </h2>
>> <section id="n-informative-references">
>> <h3 id="s-3.1">
>>   <a href="#s-3.1" class="selfRef">3.1.</a>
>>   <a href="#n-informative-references" class="selfRef">
>>     Informative References</a></h3>
>> <dl class="reference">...
>> </dl>
>> </section>
>> </section>
> This doesn't explain where the ID for the enclosing section comes 
> from.

Which ID are you referring to? Both of those look pretty clear to me, 
but maybe I'm missing something.

--Paul Hoffman

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list