[rfc-i] <tt> vs HTML5
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Sat Feb 20 08:51:42 PST 2016
On 20 Feb 2016, at 8:38, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-02-20 17:29, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On 20 Feb 2016, at 2:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> 9.63. <tt>
>>>> This element is directly rendered as its HTML counterpart.
>>> So that's a requirement to produce invalid HTML...
>> We could easily fix this by getting rid of <tt> in the XML and
>> it with <kbd>. Given that <tt> isn't in the v2 grammar, this change
>> seems easy.
> Well, replacing it with <kbd> wouldn't be sufficient, because not all
> cases of <tt> would be valid uses of <kbd>.
What do you mean by "all cases of <tt>"? It is currently defined as:
Causes the text to be displayed in a constant-width font.
This element can be combined with other character formatting
elements, and the
formatting will be additive.
More information about the rfc-interest