[rfc-i] How to indent artwork with surrounding block

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Feb 16 22:46:28 PST 2016


On 2016-02-17 04:57, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 17/02/2016 16:27, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> In re-reading this thread, I am now of the belief that we don't need <example> or even <sourcecode type="example">. The various
>> RFCs that discuss code in RFCs don't make any differentiation between code and examples, so there is no need for us to in the v3
>> format.
>>
>> If this changes in the future based on some (prolonged) discussion about IPR, we can make a change to the format then. Trying to
>> predict what might be desired is a really bad idea.
>
> To be clear, are you assuming that tags like <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS>
> will continue to be inserted manually by individual authors, as part of the
> <sourcecode> text?
>
> I have no problem with that, but it needs to be explicit.

I have a big problem with that, as it (a) defeats styling and (b) breaks 
the code semantics. That's why I suggested a separate attribute for that 
(see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html#ext-rfc2629.artwork).

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list