[rfc-i] iab-xml2rfc-02: SVG
douglasroyer at gmail.com
Sun Feb 14 11:12:13 PST 2016
Simply because of the usage of the tag <svg> with no qualifiers.
<svg> By itself means full SVG.
The rfc-svg draft is not ready, its interesting, but not ready for last
Perhaps before the first usage of <svg>, for us learning SVG, a simple
mention of tiny-SVG or a subset of SVG would be used.
After reading iab-xml2rfc, I envisioned full color drafts. Possibly
interactive web pages. A mention of tiny-SVG would have made me look it
up before continuing, or at at least reserved my understand until I read
up on tiny-SVG.
Just my feedback :-)
On 02/13/2016 01:45 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2016, at 10:59, Doug Royer wrote:
>> After reading iab-xml2rfc it gave me the impression that the full SVG
>> (1.1) could be used.
> Can you point out where you got that impression. We should certainly
> make sure that doesn't happen. I ask because we explicitly say "The use
> of SVG in Internet-Drafts and RFCs is covered in much more detail in
> [SVGforRFCs]", which itself is really clear that this is a subset. But
> if there are other places, we can fix that.
> --Paul Hoffman
Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
DouglasRoyer at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4251 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the rfc-interest