[rfc-i] Fwd: Call for Comment: RFC Format Drafts
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
rse at rfc-editor.org
Fri Feb 12 08:44:55 PST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2/12/16 8:28 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-02-12 16:42, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>> Hello all,
>> In case you missed yesterday's post to regarding the status of the
>> format documents, they are now out for community comment. Please
>> send comments of support, concern, or other feedback to the IAB
>> (iab at iab.org). If you have never posted to that list, it will be
>> temporarily held in moderation until your address can be put on
>> the white list.
>> Discussion on specific drafts or requests for clarification can
>> always be sent here to rfc-interest or to the draft authors.
>> Thank you for your time and interest, Heather
> Sending feedback to the IAB list apparently means that it will only
> be visible to IAB members. That seems like a very bad idea for public
But it seems to be how IAB stream documents are reviewed. See the
announcements, for example, for draft-iab-irtf-chair-descriptions and
draft-iab-rfc5741bis. If yo think the IAB process should change, that's
something to take up with the IAB. Maybe an open mic question at IETF 95?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rfc-interest