[rfc-i] xml2rfc issue

Erik Wilde erik.wilde at dret.net
Wed Feb 3 16:18:00 PST 2016


On 2016-02-03 16:08, Jim Schaad wrote:
> This looks like a case where the HTML output should be different from the
> text output.  In the text output there has been a section added to the
> bibliography for the eref targets as putting the url inline is not
> necessarily what is desired.

but that's not what 
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-wilde-registries-00.txt looks like. what 
happens there (as well as in the html-ized txt version 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-registries-00) is that for the 
eref element, textual references [1] and [2] are generated, but they 
link to the bibliographic references section instead of the URIs that 
were actually specified in the input XML. in both cases, the 
eref/@target is completely ignored, and instead a reference is generated 
to something completely unrelated.

cheers,

dret.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list