[rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Scott O. Bradner sob at sobco.com
Mon Dec 5 11:40:54 PST 2016


I have asked Jorge what he thinks 

Scott

> On Dec 5, 2016, at 2:32 PM, John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> I understand that. I think there's a broader issue though. Throughout the TLP the word "text" is used to refer to
>> the contents of an IETF document. IANAL but don't we need some words that will prevent
>> ambiguity when the canonical form changes from plain text?
> 
> IANAL, but no.  The TLP is in effect a contract, and contracts are
> interpreted by humans, not by computers.
> 
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list