[rfc-i] Request for feedback: the new CSS

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 14:53:03 PST 2016

On 03/12/2016 11:39, John R Levine wrote:
>>> For that matter, I'd argue that since the XML is the canonical format,
>>> the XML code markings clearly label the code and we're done.
>> Yes, that *ought* to be the case, but I would much prefer to see the Trust legal
>> provisions modified accordingly. It's going to be complicated enough persuading
>> lawyers and judges that XML is more canonical than plain text, without also
>> expecting them to re-interpret the Trust text as well.
> I'm a trustee, I can bring it up.

That's great John, thanks. I think a very few words can fix it. Let me know
if I can help in any way.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list