[rfc-i] <referencegroup> feedback
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed Apr 27 14:16:57 PDT 2016
I've got code in the prototype for this that might not have made it into the spec yet. This isn't quite the final output (because all of my tooling is currently broken with the preptool refactor), but look at:
On 4/27/16, 8:52 AM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Julian Reschke" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>On 2016-04-27 16:39, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> Well, it fails to generate the STD format mentioned in RFC 7322, so I
>>> think it needs more work...
>> I agree it would need more work if that's true, but I don't see where it
>> doesn't. Can you give me a v3 code example where it doesn't?
>So RFC 7322 wants:
>> [STD13] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and
>> facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
>> Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
>> specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.
>How would you express that as a <referencegroup>? I don't see any prose
>in the vocabulary spec nor in the HTML spec that hints about how we
>would end up with that output.
>Best regards, Julian
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest