[rfc-i] comments on draft-iab-rfc-framework-04
lee.howard at twcable.com
Wed Apr 27 12:44:04 PDT 2016
“and a transition plan that will take the Series from a plain-text, ASCII- only format to the new formats is described on the rfc-interest mailing list [RFC-INTEREST<file:///Users/e129894/Documents/Standards%20Bodies/IAB/draft-iab-rfc-framework-04%20-%20RFC%20Format%20Framework.html#ref-RFC-INTEREST>].”
Is this different from Section 10, “Transition Plan”? Is the mailing list or Section 10 canonical?
Is “Revisable format” a temporary step in converting Canonical to Publication?
Do we need the explanation of the decision process? Will that matter, or can we remove it when the document is published?
< moving to canonical format
> moving to a canonical format
Do we want to specify xml2rfc v3, or just say “The latest version of xml2rfc”?
7.2 “is offered” is the passive voice I didn’t know if you meant in this doc or that doc.
We’re okay with “EPUB maybe later”? I am.
Typo “int this draft”
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the rfc-interest