[rfc-i] RFC2119 requirements language in security considerations?

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 18:22:53 PDT 2016

On 08/04/2016 09:54, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 17:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> This has been discussed occasionally in security WGs, with people noting that readers
>>> often only skim the Security Considerations section and thus might miss the requirements.
>> Seriously? After all these years you find that implementers don't read them, even when the
>> RFC2119 keywords are upper-cased?
> Yes. They even admit it freely.

How dispiriting.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list