[rfc-i] RFC2119 requirements language in security considerations?
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Thu Apr 7 14:54:31 PDT 2016
On 7 Apr 2016, at 17:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> This has been discussed occasionally in security WGs, with people
>> noting that readers
>> often only skim the Security Considerations section and thus might
>> miss the requirements.
> Seriously? After all these years you find that implementers don't read
> them, even when the
> RFC2119 keywords are upper-cased?
Yes. They even admit it freely.
More information about the rfc-interest