[rfc-i] Editorial wonkery - errata in -bis draffts

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Sun Oct 18 11:12:21 PDT 2015

I’m working on 7159bis and one of the acknowledged errata points to two
errors in, believe it or not, the references to the errata fixed in moving
from 4627 to 7159.

Which makes me wonder: For any value of XXX, should draft XXXbis include
the errata references from XXX’s predecessor to XXX, or just the ones that
are incorporated in moving from XXX to XXXbis?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20151018/bb3d45dc/attachment.html>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list