[rfc-i] Updating one paragraph of RFC 2026 to reflect current practice

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Fri May 29 10:49:22 PDT 2015


+1

In fact, it might even be useful to allow a note like "(latest
version)", in which case the exact current filename could always be used.

Joe

On 5/29/2015 8:09 AM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I recommend changing the text to:
> 
>    It is acceptable to reference an Internet-Draft in another Internet-
>    Draft or RFC.  >>>In an RFC,<<< such a reference must be to a specific edition of an
>    Internet-Draft by indicating its full filename, such as "draft-ietf- <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-somewg-someprotocol-03>
>    somewg-someprotocol-03 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-somewg-someprotocol-03>".


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list