[rfc-i] obsoletes/updates

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jun 25 08:32:32 PDT 2015

On 2015-06-25 17:12, John C Klensin wrote:
> ...
> Remember that we fairly often make rather significant changes to
> details post-last-call and that those changes often don't appear
> in I-Ds, especially not with justification and explanation.
 > ...

That's a problem. I've argued many times that any changes made during 
IESG evaluation or during AUTH48 which are not strictly editorial should 
require a new Internet Draft to be posted.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list