[rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-18.txt
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Wed Jun 3 15:10:27 PDT 2015
On Jun 3, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org> wrote:
> (If a separate element is chosen despite this point, it can't possibly
> be called "relref", because there is nothing relative about that deep
Since I do care about the name, I don't understand this statement. When the user specifies <relref relative="f-4" target="RFC7878">, the "f-4" is relative to the URL given in the reference for RFC7878. Why do you say there is nothing relative about it?
More information about the rfc-interest