[rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-18.txt

Carsten Bormann cabo at tzi.org
Wed Jun 3 14:30:50 PDT 2015


Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> From that
> viewpoint, I think that continuing to use <xref> is probably the best
> -- having to shift back and forth between <xref> and <relref> as a
> function of wanting to specify a fragment identifier or not seems
> cumbersome and not (to me) intuitive.

+1

(If a separate element is chosen despite this point, it can't possibly
be called "relref", because there is nothing relative about that deep
reference.)

Grüße, Carsten


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list