[rfc-i] [Json] v3imp #8 Fragment tagging on sourcecode

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Wed Jan 28 15:29:32 PST 2015


On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:25:34AM +1100, Manger, James wrote:
> >> Overall I still stand by my proposition that the RFC is the module 
> >> for ABNF purposes. Honestly it just makes things a lot simpler.
> 
> > Well, draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-13 will break this proposition.
> 
> > But this issue (two ABNF rules with the same name) was raised earlier, and no one thought it was a problem.
> 
> The issued was raised because someone did think it was a problem.

I typed too quickly.  I mean that no one thought the change had to be
made.

I still don't think so, not on account of a heretofore non-existent (and
inelegant) rule that there be at most one ABNF "module" per-RFC.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list