[rfc-i] v3imp #8 Fragment tagging on sourcecode

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Fri Jan 23 15:19:03 PST 2015


On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 06:15:03PM -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> >A mechanism that collates artwork wouldn't be difficult to implement in
> >XSLT...  Just provide an attribute for naming the file/module/appendix/
> >whatever, and an optional attribute for specifying collation order; the
> >XSLT to collate that almost writes itself.
> 
> For ABNF the order doesn't matter, as long as breaks are between
> rules. And in any case, I don't think presenting in the desired
> order is such a burden. But allowing optional sequence numbers on
> fragments might be helpful occasionally.

That's not really generic enough.  What if you have a large rule that
needs to be broken up for discussion?

Anyways, you agree on sequence numbers being optional, which would be my
proposal for this approach.

Nico
-- 


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list