[rfc-i] v3imp #8 Fragment tagging on sourcecode

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Fri Jan 23 15:19:03 PST 2015

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 06:15:03PM -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> >A mechanism that collates artwork wouldn't be difficult to implement in
> >XSLT...  Just provide an attribute for naming the file/module/appendix/
> >whatever, and an optional attribute for specifying collation order; the
> >XSLT to collate that almost writes itself.
> For ABNF the order doesn't matter, as long as breaks are between
> rules. And in any case, I don't think presenting in the desired
> order is such a burden. But allowing optional sequence numbers on
> fragments might be helpful occasionally.

That's not really generic enough.  What if you have a large rule that
needs to be broken up for discussion?

Anyways, you agree on sequence numbers being optional, which would be my
proposal for this approach.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list