[rfc-i] v3imp #6 Byte preservation for figs

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Jan 23 03:34:01 PST 2015

On 2015-01-23 10:06, Sean Leonard wrote:
> Improvement Need
> #6 Byte preservation for figs
> This improvement calls for making principled distinctions between
> octet-oriented (byte-oriented) data and character-oriented data, and
> preserving the data accordingly.
> ...

So is it what you're asking for a convention to represent arbitrary 
octet sequences in the document, where (a) they will be displayed in a 
somewhat readable manner and (b) can be reconstructed from the source file?

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list