[rfc-i] New version of the v2 and v3 examples draft

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed Jan 21 07:02:04 PST 2015


On 2015-01-21 15:51, Tony Hansen wrote:
> On 1/21/15 5:24 AM, Miek Gieben wrote:
>> [ Quoting <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> in "[rfc-i] New version of the v2
>> and v..." ]
>>> Greetings again. We have submitted draft-hoffman-rfcexamples-01.txt,
>>> which now uses an automated tool to generate the conversion from v2
>>> to v3 documents. We still have a long way to go, including more
>>> challenging parts of the v2 document, and adding a section on v3-only
>>> examples.
>>>
>>> We would love to hear more comments on these examples, and what you
>>> would find useful in this draft.
>>
>> In the v3 draft it lists <seriesInfo> twice:
>>
>> <front><seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft'
>> value='draft-example-of-xml-00'/>
>> <seriesInfo name='std' value=''/>
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
> Yes, this is correct.
> ...

OK, it might be correct according to the draft, but it *is* awful.

Let's find a solution that is less weird. A seriesInfo where "value" is 
empty doesn't make any sense; it's a hack.

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list