[rfc-i] xi:includes in references

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Jan 20 11:25:15 PST 2015


On Jan 20, 2015, at 4:27 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> Neither <name> nor @anchor are required on <references>. This is a bug in the grammar (@anchor probably was confused with @pn).
> 
> Good catch!

Now fixed in the repo. <references> now looks much more like <section>.

--Paul Hoffman


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list