[rfc-i] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iab-xml2rfcv2-00.txt
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Thu Jan 15 12:08:47 PST 2015
On 1/12/15, 2:08 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>Thanks for the explanation. I can live with it; but I am very concerned
>that the IAB should maximise its time spent on Internet architecture
>and minimise its time spent on the rest. So in this case I really hope
>that the IAB merely wields its rubber stamp.
(IAB hat on, but not speaking for the IAB)
We're happy to continue to support the RSOC and the RFC editor with
>(And I didn't cc the IAB because I assume that interested IAB members
>are here anyway.)
If this had turned into a problem, I would have brought it to more
attention from the IAB, which *would* have cut into our time spent on
other architecture issues.
However, I will say that having easily-understandable modern document
formats to get the technical work of the IETF done *is* an architecture
issue, at least in my mind. When I'm doing architecture for large
applications, the documentation, change control, testing, measurement,
configuration, etc. are all a part of the system (not just the code), and
the Internet has the same needs with respect to protocols.
More information about the rfc-interest