[rfc-i] draft-flanagan-rfc-framework-02 composition tools

Stewart Bryant stbryant at cisco.com
Fri Oct 31 08:41:47 PDT 2014

On 31/10/2014 14:30, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com> wrote:
>> Whether or not the IETF as a whole can reach a consensus I don't know, but I think the state of the composition tools does deserve some plenary level discussion to properly understand the degree of concern amongst the  author community and see if there is any consensus in any of its dimensions. Composition is something that currently impacts the 2000 members the IETF who are writing the documents that we are "in business" to deliver, so making some improvement on the current lamentable situation should be regarded as a P1 issue.
> It would certainly be nice if there were a solution to this, I agree.   There are commercial solutions, but they are not cheap.
> .
Maybe they would be if we negotiated a group buy?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list