[rfc-i] Comments on draft-flanagan-nonascii-03

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Fri Oct 31 08:05:13 PDT 2014


On 10/30/14, 11:59 PM, ""Martin J. Dürst"" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:

>> Yes, which is why there is an ASCII equivalent specified for the 
>>document
>> information at the top and the authors' addresses at the bottom.
>
>And I requested to remove it from the top of the document. Brian 
>concurred by saying one instance of the ASCII equivalent is enough.

Having both doesn't seem *so* bad, since they're separated by an entire 
document.  However, just having one ASCII instance at either the bottom or 
the top wouldn't bother me.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the rfc-interest mailing list