[rfc-i] Comments on draft-flanagan-nonascii-03
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Fri Oct 31 08:05:13 PDT 2014
On 10/30/14, 11:59 PM, ""Martin J. Dürst"" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>> Yes, which is why there is an ASCII equivalent specified for the
>> information at the top and the authors' addresses at the bottom.
>And I requested to remove it from the top of the document. Brian
>concurred by saying one instance of the ASCII equivalent is enough.
Having both doesn't seem *so* bad, since they're separated by an entire
document. However, just having one ASCII instance at either the bottom or
the top wouldn't bother me.
More information about the rfc-interest