[rfc-i] draft-flanagan-rfc-framework-02 composition tools

Stewart Bryant stbryant at cisco.com
Thu Oct 30 12:06:09 PDT 2014

On 30/10/2014 18:54, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 11:41 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On 30 Oct 2014, at 18:27, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2014 7:19 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> To be clear, the only way I would accept MS word as a reasonable
>>>> approach was if there was no post editing process, i.e. you type into a
>>>> template and ship what you get when you stop typing.
>>> The only way that can happen is if the IETF stops trying to engineer a
>>> custom solution.
>> The only way that can happen is if the IETF stops trying to engineer.
>> FTFY.  (SCNR.)
>> On a more serious note, it is interesting to see that we have two converters from markdown (and another one from a generic outliner format like Emacs’ org-mode), but none from MS-OOX (at least that I’m aware of).
>> Since MS-OOX is documented in ISO/IEC 29500, it should be a small matter of programming to build this.  Add a little visual basic for the structured parts (author info and other front matter, references), and there you are.  Why hasn’t anybody done that?  Maybe that factoid is trying to tell us something, I’m not quite sure what.
> I had plans to organize that sort of translator when the dust settled on
> this new format, time/effort permitting. My fear is that the format has
> gone off into esoterica-land in ways that might make it very difficult
> to do that translation.
> Overall, there's an awful lot of work going on here to create tools to
> support post-publication automation that I continue to view as driving
> the process but of otherwise very low value.
> If the primary issue is search, modern OSes can search text in PDFs just
> fine.
> Joe
> .
FWIW they also search .doc files just fine too.


For corporate legal information go to:


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list