[rfc-i] [xml2rfc] will <vspace=n> disappear
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Oct 16 13:40:33 PDT 2014
On 2014-10-16 22:30, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 12:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> (I agree that in the new regime we can't have an explicit page
>> break. I do wonder whether we don't need something explicit to
>> help the widow/orphan logic in some cases.)
> There are many cases where it's useful to control such things:
> - tables (either render it in a single screen/page or
> control where it breaks)
So you want to add a hint about what is a good point to break a table?
> - lists, especially hierarchical ones
> (it's preferable to break only before toplevel items)
I think that rule could be automated, right?
> I agree that pagebreak itself isn't useful - it just as
> rendering-specific as vspace.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest