[rfc-i] New draft posted: draft-flanagan-rfc-preservation-01

Donald Eastlake d3e3e3 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 11:52:42 PDT 2014


I cannot conceive of how the trivial savings of not printing out an
archival copy of every RFC on paper can possibly be worth the
increased long term risk.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3 at gmail.com


On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
<rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have updated the "Digital Preservation Considerations for the RFC
> Series" to clean up some nits and to capture the following key points:
>
> * emphasize that we should stop printing out each RFC to paper upon
> publication,
> * require that software reader applications need to be archived as well
> to make sure we can read RFCs far into the future,
> * require that the tool documentation needs to be archived along with
> the tools
>
> Please take a few moments to review the draft and offer comments.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-flanagan-rfc-preservation/
>
> - -Heather Flanagan, RSE
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPW5zAAoJEER/xjINbZoGwA4H/iO9zKqinWJUbIjbK6Y2i2vq
> izIbHe+jJo/D5Ka2ZXV3HGVch2FMud0HzM9IFvRPCUS/Qf8iIGZeMuGw/eyQxOw/
> b2HyBS3w1+bv6uLHgDsx5v1RHxnsKQPsewJRoOP0ZGxJaSfgZAOhDqRPDnKVOuH9
> BZYgg3gOIs3Lzfq/vkgZaQi512Z1CNJVuRY8VWvA3hIgWwqwu5P9d2j9m2O1g/NM
> nOmEYHN+7yJ973ryil8LFjOtPaFYjR5opHO1iGimGumQczXm7hor8IfD1fIuDguO
> wnhtpLi2gcQ7DMpFYxu0oya3uL1BqIdoRLQ56DmqnVMv/V3kIsWMdlXn6/0soYQ=
> =4HmE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list