[rfc-i] New draft: draft-hoffman-rfcexamples-00.txt
cabo at tzi.org
Thu Oct 9 16:18:02 PDT 2014
The difference between v2 and v3 would be easier to grasp if it weren’t masked by stylistic changes such as “ vs. ‘, <xx/> vs. <xx></xx> etc.
(Nothing that xmllint --format can’t fix, but extracting the xml and applying the tool is an extra step. BTW, can you spare a couple “CODE BEGINS”/“CODE ENDS” pairs for that? [RFC6087]/rfcstrip)
You also probably want to do something about the xi:include breaking up (or at least mention the example is invalid). [Pet peeve: There is no point in those overly long xml.resource.org URIs.]
More information about the rfc-interest