[rfc-i] Categories of references

Eric Burger eburger at standardstrack.com
Thu Oct 2 08:34:54 PDT 2014


+1

On Oct 2, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:

> On Oct 2, 2014, at 2:13 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> My preference wold be to just add a third reference subsection (because the tools already allow that), and to establish and document a convention that "Historical" implies "Informative" with respect to maturity checks.
> 
> That seems like a good path, in case we ever want to allow other reference subsections. "Normative" is untouched, everything else is like "Informative".
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list