[rfc-i] Categories of references
eburger at standardstrack.com
Thu Oct 2 08:34:54 PDT 2014
On Oct 2, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 2:13 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> My preference wold be to just add a third reference subsection (because the tools already allow that), and to establish and document a convention that "Historical" implies "Informative" with respect to maturity checks.
> That seems like a good path, in case we ever want to allow other reference subsections. "Normative" is untouched, everything else is like "Informative".
> --Paul Hoffman
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest