[rfc-i] Categories of references
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Thu Oct 2 07:57:01 PDT 2014
On Oct 2, 2014, at 2:13 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> My preference wold be to just add a third reference subsection (because the tools already allow that), and to establish and document a convention that "Historical" implies "Informative" with respect to maturity checks.
That seems like a good path, in case we ever want to allow other reference subsections. "Normative" is untouched, everything else is like "Informative".
More information about the rfc-interest