[rfc-i] URIs in references, was: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"

Peter Koch pk at DENIC.DE
Thu Mar 27 10:22:49 PDT 2014

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:57:00AM +0900, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:

> with a search engine. We can also publish an erratum; for an actual 
> example, please see
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6055.

an erratum to update a URL that was correctly resolvable at the
time of publication is at least questionable. While the example
illustrates (with another leap of faith, though) that discriminating
along the lines of 'private' vs 'corporate' is brave, the chosen
approach appears to have scaling issues.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list