[rfc-i] URIs in references, was: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"

Tony Hansen tony at att.com
Wed Mar 26 09:15:03 PDT 2014

On 3/25/14, 6:49 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> That doesn't work for me.
> It makes Mark Nottingham's and Tim Bray's super-stable blog URIs 
> disallowed (personal web page), but would make a random blogger.com 
> page acceptable.
> Yes, it's hard to check. In doubt, trust the author of the spec. 
> He/she is interested in providing useful links.

I agree with this sentiment. However, I think it is also worthwhile 
having the RFC editor make a pass on the URIs with the author to verify 
that these indeed are the "best" URIs. Guidance on what makes a URI "the 
best" is somewhat subjective, but using Heather's list as guidelines 
instead of hard-and-fast rules makes the most sense to me.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list