[rfc-i] Keeping some of the PIs from v2 in v3, but as an actual part of the grammar

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Tue Mar 18 10:51:47 PDT 2014

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 01:36:44PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> XML2RFC. But providing a TOC should not be a choice in an ID or RFC, it
> should be a requirement.

Indeed, the last draft from the RFD Editor said that the TOC is
required, so I don't see any reason to include such a mechanism in
that case.  (I do think a TOC for a 2 page document, plus boilerplate,
is ridiculous, but I gather I am in the minority.)


Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list