[rfc-i] XML2RFC ticket #227 - failure for reference missing anchor attribute

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed Mar 5 23:32:32 PST 2014

On 2014-03-06 00:03, Jim Schaad wrote:
> Unless I hear any objections, the anchor is going to become a required
> attribute in the dtd at the end of the week.
> Jim

I agree that the processor should behave this way, and if changing the 
DTD is how you get there: +1.

That being said: are we also ok with making this change in the v2 spec? 
I personally think it's a good idea.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list