[rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt

Dearlove, Christopher (UK) chris.dearlove at baesystems.com
Fri Jun 27 05:09:41 PDT 2014

Can't try my favourite browser right now, just the one installed here. Which you probably wouldn't believe what it is. And that works. (At least it does in print preview, I chose not to expend the ink and paper.)

There's only one place it's really tested, but there is one place.

Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris.dearlove at baesystems.com | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke at gmx.de] 
Sent: 27 June 2014 12:32
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK); John Levine; rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt

----------------------! WARNING ! ---------------------- This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or from the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.

On 2014-06-27 12:29, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
> Now that's just deliberately insulting.
> No one has suggested not being able to put things on an iPad.
> However it also remains useful to put things reliably, and formatted at least to the point of not splitting things cross pages, on paper. Fanfold is just an transparent attempt to make an opinion not your own look archaic.
> And this got raised because you may not want paper, but some of us do, and you at least now appear to be ready to steamroller those who disagree with you.
> At the moment what appears to be on offer is
> - Text, but freeflowing and not suitable (tables and figures will break).
> - HTML, where some (but definitely not all) browsers might offer what you want, but at the least not guaranteed.
 > ...

...it would be awesome if we could have a discussion involving "might", but based on facts.

Please try to print <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html> from your favorite browser and report back what you think is missing.

Best regards, Julian
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list