[rfc-i] reject the past ( was Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt)

Donald Eastlake d3e3e3 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 09:30:29 PDT 2014


The IETF already has bad experience with adopting shiny new
technology. Postscript was permitted for a while for the normative
version of standards until the usual instability of such fancy things
caused that decision to be backed out. I can be pretty confident that
the 1968 version of ASCII isn't going to change. I'm equally confident
PDF and HTML and XML and ... will change.

 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3 at gmail.com

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> This nicely demonstrates a basic problem in these discussions, namely
>> ignoring demonstrated utility over many years.
> People who find new technologies to have greater utility are not ignoring the demonstrated utility of the old ones.
>> It encourages embracing whatever shiny new capability attracts us now,
> ...rest of fallacious argument elided...
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list