[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Fred Baker (fred) fred at cisco.com
Sun Jun 22 02:13:53 PDT 2014

On Jun 21, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter at adobe.com> wrote:

> Based on feedback I'd propose not adding 2119 keyword markup at this time.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20140622/134060b5/attachment.asc>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list