[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Thu Jun 19 21:30:53 PDT 2014

On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:20 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:35:10PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> The general thrust of your argument is that typography should be normative.
> I don't think that was the thrust of my argument, at all.

Okay, fair enough.   It's just the effect that what you are arguing for would have.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list