[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Thu Jun 19 18:16:27 PDT 2014

On 20/06/2014 13:07, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Tim Bray <tbray at textuality.com> wrote:
>> +1 to all of Nico’s points.
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
>>> I would also like an attribute or tag for indicating that some text is
> Seriously?

And presumably text that isn't tagged NORMATIVE or INFORMATIVE will be
tagged by default as UNINFORMATIVE.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list