[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Eliot Lear lear at cisco.com
Thu Jun 19 06:21:01 PDT 2014

On 6/19/14, 3:10 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
> If we mark up the 2119 words, it's trivial to change how they look using CSS or in the XML-to-text conversion.

Sure.  I guess what I'm asking is whether we this is a discussion about
how or whether we will mark up 2119 keywords.  If it's how, then as
someone who writes drafts, I can live with <must /> or &must.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list