[rfc-i] Host names and ownership of the XML coverter

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Jun 2 03:03:42 PDT 2014

On 2014-06-02 11:18, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> On 5/28/14, 8:38 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On May 28, 2014, at 8:02 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon at nominum.com> wrote:
>>> I've never understood why we were using the xml.resource.org domain--it
>>> doesn't really make any sense, because "xml" is way too generic.
>>> So I don't think there's any value in continuing to use it.   I
>>> think the rfc-editor.org/ietf.org split makes a lot of sense,
>>> iff the RSE agrees.
> Hosting the tools somewhere in the ietf.org domain makes sense; it more
> accurately reflects the usage pattern and support model.  The
> bibliographic data, however, I'd very much like to see hosted at
> rfc-editor.org.  I think it makes more sense for the RFC Editor to
> maintain that set of information than for the IETF to do so.
> -Heather

Are you going to maintain them for Internet Drafts, W3C specs, etc, as well?

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list