[rfc-i] Text no longer definitive (was Re: Proposed way forwards on backward compatibility with v2)

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Tue Feb 18 13:44:20 PST 2014

On 2/18/2014 1:40 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>  If we're aiming at
> the RFC793 level of detail, I think that's a new guideline for the
> whole community.

Not new to everyone. It should be required as a minimum expectation, 
though - including addressing the upper layer interface (API).


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list