[rfc-i] vspace in v3

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Feb 17 13:00:55 PST 2014

On 2/17/2014 12:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> For v3, "page break" makes no sense because the canonical format has no pages. For "line break", I suspect <artwork> and <t> will be fine.

There is nothing wrong with having a canonical format also permit 
carriage of constructs that work (and are useful) for some derived 
formats but not others.  It's not as clean as anyone would like, but it 
is often practical.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list